The language learning theories of Professor J. Cummins (2024)

This page has information about the second language learning theories of J. Cummins and their implications for mainstream teachers.

Introduction

Professor J. Cummins is one of the world's leading authorities on bilingual education and second language acquisition. This page covers four of his most influential insights: different types of language (BICS/ CALP), common underlying language proficiency, a way to assess task difficulty, and additive/subtractive bilingualism.

@ Mainstream teachers who have a knowledge of Cummins' insights will be in a much stronger position to help the ESL students in their classes learn the mainstream subject while at the same time developing their English language proficiency. ~

BICS/CALP

Cummins makes the distinction between two differing kinds of language proficiency. BICS are Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills. These are the "surface" skills of listening andspeaking which are typically acquired quickly by many students. This is particularly true for students from languagebackgrounds similar to English who spend a lot of their school time interacting with native speakers.

CALP is Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency, and, as the name suggests, is the basis for astudent's ability to cope with the academic demands placed upon her in the various subjects.

Cumminsstates that while many children develop native speaker fluency (i.e. BICS) within two years ofimmersion in the target language, @@ it takes between 5-7 years for a child to be working on a parwith native speakers as far as academic language is concerned. ~~

In other words, the non-native speakers inmainstream classes who have exited from the ESL program Non-native English students typically remain in special English language (ESL) programs for a maximum of three years. This is clearly not enough time to reach the levels CALP attained by their native English-speaking peers. are still, in most cases, in the processof catching up with their native speaking peers as far as CALP is concerned.

- Implications for mainstream teachers

It should not be assumed that non-native students who have attained a high degree of fluency andaccuracy in everyday spoken English (BICS) have the corresponding academic languageproficiency (CALP).

Students may well still be struggling with the demands of comprehending and composing academic texts. In particular, they are very likely to still have considerable gaps in their academic vocabulary.

Common Underlying Proficiency

Briefly stated, Cummins believes that in the course of learning one language a child acquires a setof skills and implicit metalinguistic knowledge that can be drawn upon when working in anotherlanguage. This common underlying proficiency (CUP), as he calls these skills and knowledge, isillustrated in the Iceberg Analogy below.

It can be seen that the CUP provides the base for the developmentof both the first language (L1) and the second language (L2). It follows that any expansion of CUPthat takes place in one language will have a beneficial effect on the other language(s). This theoryalso serves to explain why it becomes easier to learn each additional language.

The language learning theories of Professor J. Cummins (1)
Wikimedia Commons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Iceberg_Model.gif

- Implications for mainstream teachers

@@@ It is very important that students be encouraged to continue their native language development. Whenparents ask about the best ways they can help their child at home, you can reply that the childshould have the opportunity to read extensively in her own language. ~~~

You could suggest that parentsmake some time every evening to discuss with their child, in their native language, what shehas done in school that day. For example, ask her to talk about the science experiment she did, question her abouther understanding of primary and secondary sources of historical information, have her explain howshe has solved a mathematics problem.

As Cummins (2000) states:

"Conceptual knowledge developed in one language helps to make input inthe other language comprehensible."

If a child already understands the concepts ofjustice or honesty in her own language, all she has to do is acquire thelabel for these terms in English. She has a far more difficult task, however, if she has to acquireboth the label and the concept in her second language.

Assessing task difficulty

Cummins has devised a model whereby the different tasks we expect our students to engage in can becategorized. In the diagram below tasks range in difficulty along one continuum from cognitivelyundemanding to cognitively demanding. And along the other continuum from context-embedded tocontext-reduced.

A context-embedded task is one in which the student has access to a range ofadditional visual and oral cues. For example, he can look at illustrations of what is being talkedabout or ask questions to confirm understanding.

A context-reduced task is one such as listening toa lecture or reading dense text, where there are no sources of help other than the language itself.

Clearly, a D quadrant task, which is both cognitively demanding and context- reduced, is likely tobe the most difficult for students. This is particularly true for non-native speakers in their first years oflearning English, i.e. before they have acquired much CALP. However, it is essential that ESL students develop the ability to accomplish suchtasks, since academic success is impossible without it.

Click inside a quadrant above to see examples of that type.

For more on assessing task difficulty, using Bloom's taxonomy (Wikipedia), click the button below.

Assessing task difficulty

Bloom's taxonomy (Knowledge → Comprehension → Application → Analysis → Synthesis) provides a useful way of determining whether a task is demanding or undemanding. Activities which fall within the category of Knowledge - such as collecting, naming, showing etc. - will clearly be less demanding than Analysis activities such as comparing, explaining and inferring.

The degree to which a task is context-embedded depends on the number of channels of information available to the student. So a student who listens to a news report on the radio has only one channel of information - this is a context-reduced learning experience.

Compare this with the student who reads a report about the same event in a newspaper article which contains photographs and diagrams. The student can read at her own speed and has access to a dictionary.

If she can also ask another student or her parents to explain parts of the text, then she has many channels of information available to her. This is clearly a context-embedded activity and as a result is much more manageable.

It is difficult to see the value of any tasks that are cognitively undemanding and context-reduced. Copying a list of the kings and queens of England from a textbook to an exercise book is an example of such an activity.It is sometimes called busy work.

- Implications for mainstream teachers

If teachers have an awareness of the likely difficulty of a task, based on Cummins' model, they canjudge its appropriateness for the non-native speakers in their classes and in this way avoid muchfrustration.

This does not mean, however, that ESL students should be fed a diet ofcognitively-undemanding tasks. It may be beneficial to use such activities in the student's earlydays at school, in order to build confidence, or as a lead in to a more challenging activity.

However, teachers should switch soon to tasks that engage the students' thinking processes, and make these tasksaccessible by providing visual or other support. Once students are comfortable with suchactivities, they can be gradually exposed to tasks that are both cognitively-demanding andcontext-reduced.

For an interesting discussion of what happens when teachers start with a D quadrant task and thenhave to modify it to avoid embarrassment and confusion in the classroom, see the Mackay articlelisted in the references below.

Coelho, see reference below, has a useful example of how to use the quadrant in designing support for ESL students doing a science project.

Additive/subtractive bilingualism

Cummins draws the distinction between two types of bilingualism. Additive bilingualism is bilingualism in which the first language continues tobe developed and the first culture to be valued while the second language is added.

Subtractivebilingualism is bilingualism in which the second language is added at the expense of the first language and culture,which diminish as a consequence.

Cummins (1994) quotes research which suggests students working in anadditive bilingual environment succeed to a greater extent than those whose first language andculture are not valued by their schools and by the wider society.

- Implications for mainstream teachers

The dangers of subtractive bilingualism for the non-native English speakers in international schools are obviously notso strong as, say, for the children of immigrants to the USA.

Nevertheless, we should do all we canto demonstrate to non-native English students that their cultures and languages are equally as validand valued as the Anglo/American culture and English language that inevitably dominates English-medium international schoollife.

Teachers and departments should explore ways to incorporate the different culturalbackgrounds of our students into their daily teaching and curricula.

Conclusion

Cummins' research in the areas of second language acquisition discussed above date from the last century. But his insights and advice continue to have great relevance for language policy makers, administrators and mainstream teachers alike.

References

The summary above is based on the following articles or book extracts by Cummins or about histheories.

  • ^ 1 ^
  • ^ 63 ^
  • ^ 10 ^
  • ^ 13 ^
  • ^ 17 ^
  • ^ 14 ^
  • ^ 16 ^
  • ^ 15 ^
  • ^ 22 ^
  • ^ 31^
  • ^ 43 ^
The language learning theories of Professor J. Cummins (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 6570

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.